Structure and format
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Included |
Not included |
|
|
| |
Portfolio uses a binder |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| |
Section separators |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| |
Names on outside cover |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| |
Names and contact information
on the first page |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| |
This grading sheet included in
portfolio |
4 |
0 |
|
|
| |
|
Complete |
Missing portions |
Not included |
|
| |
Table of contents |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
| |
|
Great: no problems |
Good: a few minor problems |
Poor: Problems throughout
(your mark in other sections may also be affected as well) |
|
| |
Appearance (organization,
layout and whitespace) |
6 |
4 |
0 |
|
| |
|
No typos, grammatical or
spelling errors, clear writing style |
Minor typos or
grammatical errors or spelling mistakes or some writing may be a bit
vague |
Problems in two areas
(spelling, grammar, style) |
Problems in all three areas |
| |
Language and writing style |
7 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Setting the stage
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Clear and complete |
|
Missing |
|
| |
Background |
3 |
|
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Methodology
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Clear and complete |
|
Missing |
|
| |
Description of the test
procedure (how you ran your test e.g., no. and skill of participants,
how participants were allocated among three different approaches) and
how clearly this information was presented |
8 |
|
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Excellent |
|
Missing |
|
| |
Pre-test questionnaire: quality
of the questions (relevance, coverage, clarity) as well as an
explanation for why questions were included |
4 |
|
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Excellent |
|
Missing |
|
| |
Post-test questionnaire:
quality of the questions (relevance, coverage, clarity) as well as an
explanation for why questions were included |
4 |
|
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Observations
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Excellent |
|
Missing |
|
| |
Grading criteria includes: the ability to
summarize important findings, clarity of presentation, separation of
observations from interpretations |
10 |
|
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Interpretations
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Grading criteria includes: whether minor
or major strengths/weaknesses were listed, completeness of the list, how
well points were justified and the clarity of the presentation. |
Excellent |
|
Missing |
|
| |
Strengths |
8 |
|
0 |
|
| |
Weaknesses |
8 |
|
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Suggested improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grading criteria includes: whether the improvements were based on minor
or major weaknesses, completeness of the list, how well points were
justified and the clarity of the presentation. |
Excellent |
|
Missing |
|
| |
|
10 |
|
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Conclusions |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Excellent |
|
Missing |
|
| |
Grading criteria includes: the ability to
summarize important points from the report. |
4 |
|
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Appendix I |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Excellent: many additional insights
based on study results |
Poor: a rehash of the lectures
describing the techniques |
Missing |
|
| |
Comparison of the three observation
techniques |
6 |
2 |
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Appendix II |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Clear and complete record of the study
results |
|
Missing |
|
| |
Note: because the information in this
section is used as the justification for other sections, receiving a
poor grade in this section may result in poor grade in some of the other
sections as well. |
4 |
|
0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Tutorial presentations
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Good |
|
Missing |
|
| |
Task for test participants |
2 |
|
0 |
|
| |
System strength |
2 |
|
0 |
|
| |
System weakness |
2 |
|
0 |
|
| |
Suggested improvement |
2 |
|
0 |
|
| |
| |
| |
| Reminder: you also need to include your
signed contribution forms when you hand in your portfolio. For
each week you can use either of the two approaches (depending whether or
not the work was equally divided for the week). I won't be able to
grade your assignment unless you do hand in your signed contribution
form. |