| Student Names | _____________________ | _____________________ | _____________________ |
| ID Number | _____________________ | _____________________ | _____________________ |
| Completeness of Report | Missing | Incomplete portions | Complete |
| scenario | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| methodology | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| observations | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| interpretations | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| suggested improvements | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| conclusions | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Appendix 1: Comparison | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Appendix 2: Raw data | |||
| . | |||
| . | |||
| Graphics of work (e.g., appearance of the cover & content, typography, illustrations, white space) | Ugly
0 |
Okay
0 |
Looks Great.
0 |
| Length of report | Way too long or short
0 |
0 |
Perfect, don't add or delete
another character
0 |
| . | |||
| . | |||
| Literary Quality | Poor | Ok, but proof it more | Great |
| ( grammar, paragraph structure, section structure, clarity of writing, style and interest, verboseness) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| spelling/typos | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Technical Quality | Poor. | Okay | Great |
| scenario | 0 (poor background) | 0 | 0 (explained system, your role, & point of report) |
| methodology | 0 (didn't summarize) | 0 | 0 (concise description of methods used) |
| Quality of tasks | 0 (poor tasks - hardly anyone would try to complete these tasks) | 0 (excellent sample tasks) | |
| Questionnaire | 0 (irrelevant questions) | 0 | 0 (highly relevant questions) |
| observations | 0 (hard to understand) | 0 | 0 (good summary of observations) |
| interpretations | 0 (little insight added) | 0 | 0 (strength/weaknesses identified/generalized) |
| suggested improvements | 0 (poor/minor) | 0 | 0 (excellent low-cost design changes) |
| conclusions and recommendations | 0 (didn't conclude) | 0 | 0 (summarized results and recommendations) |
| Appendix 1 | 0 (little insight added) | 0 | 0 (excellent discussion of methods) |
| Appendix 2 | 0 (poorly organized) | 0 | 0 (shows good record-keeping) |
| Thoroughness of task selection (i.e., did you miss any)? | 0 (only used sample tasks) | 0 (provided a few good tasks, missed a few minor ones or one important task) | 0 (provided a good range of tasks) |
| Thoroughness of treatment | 0 (superficial) | 0 | 0 (balanced depth & breadth) |
| . | |||
| . | |||
| . | |||
| . |
Grade: A ....... A- ....... B+ ....... B ....... B- ....... C+
....... C ....... C- ....... D+ ....... D ....... D- ....... F+ ....... F
....... F-
Note : A is superior report; B is better than
expected; C is adequate; D is poor; F is unacceptable
Turn over for
evaluator's comments and/or see report. Students are invited to see the T.A. for
further comments on their report.